In American Legion v. American Humanist Association, the court allowed a 40-foot cross honoring soldiers from World War I to remain on government land. For judgments handed down before 31 July 2009 please refer to the House of Lords or BAILII websites.

Decided cases can also be found using the search engine below: Go to the Complaints Policies and Judicial Conduct, Miller and others (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v Shah (Appellant), Patel (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), R (on the application of NHS Property Services Ltd) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and another (Respondents), R (on the application of Lancashire County Council) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Respondent), MacDonald and another (Respondents) v Carnbroe Estates Ltd (Appellant) (Scotland), R (on the application of Hemmati and others) (AP) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant), Royal Mail Group Ltd (Respondent) v Jhuti (Appellant), Edwards on behalf of the Estate of the late Thomas Arthur Watkins (Respondent) v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors (Appellant), R (on the application of Wright) (Respondent) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest of Dean District Council (Appellants), RR (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent), R v Reeves Taylor (AP) (Appellant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent), Singularis Holdings Ltd (In Official Liquidation) (A Company Incorporated in the Cayman Islands) (Respondent) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd (Appellant), Travelers Insurance Company Ltd (Appellant) v XYZ (Respondents), Sequent Nominees Ltd (formerly Rotrust Nominees Ltd) (Appellant) v Hautford Ltd (a company registered in the British Virgin Islands) (Respondent), The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd (Appellant) v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) (Respondent), Shanks (Appellant) v Unilever Plc and others (Respondents), Gilham (Appellant) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), Routier and another (Appellants) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland), R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent), Akçil and others (Appellants) v Koza Ltd and another (Respondents), Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Frank A Smart & Son Ltd (Respondent) (Scotland), Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd (Appellant/Cross Respondent) v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) (Respondent/Cross Appellant), X (Appellant) v Kuoni Travel Ltd (Respondent), R (on the application of Association of Independent Meat Suppliers and another) (Appellants) v Food Standards Agency (Respondent), Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v Franco Vomero (Italy) (Respondent), Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant) v MM (Respondent) (Scotland), London Borough of Lambeth (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and others (Respondents), Tillman (Respondent) v Egon Zehnder Ltd (Appellant), Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Appellant) v Gubeladze (Respondent), OWD Ltd trading as Birmingham Cash and Carry (In Liquidation) and another (Respondents) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant), OWD Ltd trading as Birmingham Cash and Carry (In Liquidation) and another (Appellants) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) and others (Appellants) v Connect Shipping Inc and another (Respondents), Samuels (Appellant) v Birmingham City Council (Respondent), Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Ltd and another (Appellants), In the matter of an application by Dennis Hutchings for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), Poole Borough Council (Respondent) v GN (through his litigation friend "The Official Solicitor") and another (Appellants), Hancock and another (Appellants) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Telereal Trillium (Respondent) v Hewitt (Valuation Officer) (Appellant), R (on the application of Privacy International) (Appellant) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others (Respondents), R (on the application of DS and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent), R (on the application of DA and others) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent), Vedanta Resources PLC and another (Appellants) v Lungowe and others (Respondents), R (on the application of Derry) (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Appellant), R (on the application of Newby Foods Ltd) (Appellant) v Food Standards Agency (Respondent), Stocker (Appellant) v Stocker (Respondent), R&S Pilling t/a Phoenix Engineering (Respondent) v UK Insurance Ltd (Appellant), Actavis Group PTC EHF and others (Respondents) v ICOS Corporation and another (Appellants), SAE Education Ltd (Appellant) v The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Takhar (Appellant) v Gracefield Developments Limited and others (Respondents), Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) (Appellants), Robinson (formerly JR (Jamaica)) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), KV (Sri Lanka) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), Konecny (Appellant) v District Court in Brno-Venkov, Czech Republic (Respondent), In the matter of an application by Geraldine Finucane for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), Cameron (Respondent) v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd (Appellant), Perry (Respondent) v Raleys Solicitors (Appellant), R (on the application of P) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and others (Respondents), R (on the application of P, G and W) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Appellants), In the matter of an application by Lorraine Gallagher for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), R (on the application of Nealon) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent), R (on the application of Hallam) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent), Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of devolution issues to the Supreme Court pursuant to Paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (No 2), Judicial Committee of The Privy Council website. In Iancu v. Brunetti, the court struck down a federal law barring the registration of vulgar trademarks, saying it ran afoul of the First Amendment. The 2019 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 7, 2019 and concluded October 4, 2020. The court announced on June 27 that Carpenter v. Murphy, a case considering whether much of eastern Oklahoma is an Indian reservation, will be reargued next term. This page contains a list of Decided cases handed down in 2019. In Gamble v. United States, the court refused to overrule precedents allowing two prosecutions for the same crimes, one in federal court and one in state court. Justices faced political battles over partisan and racial gerrymandering and the Trump administration’s plan to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

In two cases, Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek, the court ruled that the Constitution does not bar extreme partisan gerrymandering. Decided cases can also be found using the search engine below: Go to the Complaints Policies and Judicial Conduct, Alexander Devine Children's Cancer Trust (Respondent) v Housing Solutions Ltd (Appellant), Secretary of State for Health and others (Respondents) v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others (Appellants), Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her Litigation Friend, The Official Solicitor) (Appellant) v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust (Respondent), Stoffel & Co (Appellant) v Grondona (Respondent), R (on the application of Pathan) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), R (on the application of Z and another) (AP) (Appellants) v Hackney London Borough Council and another (Respondents, R (on the application of Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd) (Appellant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent), Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. (Respondent) v OOO Insurance Company Chubb (Appellant), ZTE Corporation and another (Appellants) v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL (Respondent), Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another (Appellants) v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL (Respondent), Unwired Planet International Ltd and another (Respondents) v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another (Appellants), Peninsula Securities Ltd (Respondent) v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Appellant) (Northern Ireland), Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (Respondent) v Parry and others (Appellants), Shagang Shipping Company Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant) v HNA Group Company Ltd (Respondent), Lehtimaki and others (Respondents) v Cooper (Appellant), Sutherland (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), Sevilleja (Respondent) v Marex Financial Ltd (Appellant), Villiers (Appellant) v Villiers (Respondent), R v Hilton (Respondent) (Northern Ireland), The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v K E Entertainments Ltd (Appellant) (Scotland), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc (Respondent) v Kymab Ltd (Appellant), In the matter of XY (AP) (Appellant) (Scotland), ABC (AP) (Appellant) v Principal Reporter and another (Respondents) (Scotland), Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in liquidation) (Appellant) v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd (Respondent), Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd and others (Respondents) v MasterCard Incorporated and others (Appellants), Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd (Respondent) v Visa Europe Services LLC and others (Appellants), Serafin (Respondent) v Malkiewicz and others (Appellants), Fowler (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant), Cardtronics UK Ltd and others (Respondents) v Sykes and others (Valuation Officers) (Appellants), Dill (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another (Respondents), Duval (Respondent) v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd (Appellant), AM (Zimbabwe) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), R (on the application of Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and another) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Respondent), Zipvit Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Whittington Hospital NHS Trust (Appellant) v XX (Respondent), Barclays Bank plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents), WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (Appellant) v Various Claimants (Respondents), Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others (Respondents) v Credit Europe Bank NV (Appellant), Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others (Appellants) v Credit Europe Bank NV (Respondent), Elgizouli (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), MS (Pakistan) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), R (on the application of DN (Rwanda)) (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), In the matter of an application by Deborah McGuinness for Judicial Review (AP) (Northern Ireland) No 2, In the matter of an application by Deborah McGuinness for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), Micula and others (Respondents/Cross-Appellants) v Romania (Appellant/Cross-Respondent), R (on the application of Jalloh (Liberia)) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant), R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant), A Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of devolution issues to the Supreme Court pursuant to Paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998, FMX Foods Merchants Import Export Co Ltd (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (Appellant), Judicial Committee of The Privy Council website.